APS, in seems, has shed one negative with the K-5, substantial sensitivity noise. Not completely, obviously, but its significant reduction may relegate it to a greatly reduced issue. FF then is to some extent of less importance and I find that a relief.
Jack --- On Sun, 9/26/10, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Larry Colen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Photokina observations... > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, September 26, 2010, 5:09 PM > > On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > > > I agree with the gist of this. People focus (no > pun intended) on FF > > systems as the "way to go" because there are so many > lenses out there > > built for this format. > > The difference between 24x36 and APS sensor camera > systems? > Two years and twice the price. > > APS sensor cameras are getting fast enough that even now > relatively fast zooms (2.8) are fast enough for a large > portion of my indoor shooting. > > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] > sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
