I'm in Kansas, you? How much would you want for it?

~Nick David Wright
http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/


--- On Sat, 2/7/09, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Larry Colen <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: short tele primes
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 3:43 AM
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:32:59PM -0800, Nick Wright wrote:
> 
> # 
> # That's very interesting. I'm not sure why I
> hadn't given more thought to the 135 lenses before. My
> first tele lens was a Sears 135/2.8 that was one of the
> sharpest lenses I've ever owned.
> 
> They're generally a bit long for indoors, but when I
> have a chance to
> use them, they're very sweet, they're also very
> easy and inexpensive
> to find. 
> 
> Where do you live? I could loan you my 3.5 if you wanted to
> play with
> it for a while. If you decide you can't bear to part
> with it, send me
> some money. If you decide it sucks, send it back.
> 
> # 
> 
> # You said yours are the M series? They are quite a bit
> less expensive
> # than the others. I think that might be right up my alley.
> ;D 
> 
> I think that they are "M", They are all manual,
> PK mount.
> # 
> # ~Nick David Wright
> # http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
> # 
> # 
> # --- On Sat, 2/7/09, Larry Colen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> # 
> # > From: Larry Colen <[email protected]>
> # > Subject: Re: short tele primes
> # > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> <[email protected]>
> # > Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 3:15 AM
> # > They're a little bit longer than the range you
> # > mentioned, but I really
> # > like my M135s. 
> # > 
> # > I started out with the 3.5 
> # >
> http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157606933007213/
> # > 
> # > and liked shooting with it so much I got a 2.5:
> # >
> http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612665849907/
> # > 
> # > Those aren't the only lenses I was shooting with
> each
> # > of those
> # > nights. At the other end of the short tele scale is
> my
> # > FA77, but
> # > that's not an inexpensive lens:
> # > 
> # > 135/3.5:
> # >
> http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/2794369036/in/set-72157606933007213/
> # > 
> # > 135/2.5:
> # >
> http://flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3205338605/sizes/l/in/set-72157612707149030/
> # > 
> # > I ought to sell my 135. I think I paid between $60
> and $80
> # > plus
> # > shipping. It is, however, a bit smaller than the
> 2.5, so
> # > I'm not
> # > trying too hard to sell it.
> # > 
> # > I'm currently bidding on an M100/2.8 in Oz.
> It's up
> # > to AU $100, and I
> # > probably ought to save my money for the DFA 100/2.8
> macro.
> # > 
> # > -- 
> # >         It's not the steps in the dance,
> it's the
> # > dance in the steps.
> # > Larry Colen             [email protected]           
> # > http://www.red4est.com/lrc
> # > 
> # > 
> # > --
> # > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> # > [email protected]
> # > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> # > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> # > directly above and follow the directions.
> # 
> # 
> #       
> # 
> # 
> # --
> # PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> # [email protected]
> # http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> # to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
>         It's not the steps in the dance, it's the
> dance in the steps.
> Larry Colen             [email protected]           
> http://www.red4est.com/lrc
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to