Paul,

A MacBook is not as fast as a G5 2.0DP running Photoshop, by a long  
ways. It's a matter of bus performance: I've compared them directly,  
with instrumentation.Neither is a G4 DP 1.25. The MacBook Pro is on  
par with a G5 2GDP: faster bus, better graphics card, but drives are  
slower so you have to be careful.

The Mac Pro towers wup all of them into the dust! My brother had a  
video processing job that his 2.5Ghz DP G5 was going to take 22 hours  
to complete. A friend loaned him a Mac Pro Quad-Core that smacked it  
down to 4.2 hours. Now that's fast. ;-)

Godfrey



On Jun 25, 2008, at 8:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> But keep in mind that if you're only concerned about how well the  
> machine will run right now, a top of the line G4 will do just fine.  
> My dual 1.25 G4 with a huge scratch disk and 2 gigs of RAM is just  
> as fast runing PSCS 1 as my Macbook 2 Ghz Intel Cord Duo with 1 gig  
> of Ram is running PSCS 3. if you just want to process photos on a  
> Mac platform with currently available operating system and software,  
> the best G4s will serve you well. If you're thinking ahead, you will  
> want an Intel machine. A G5 is kind of caught in the middle: It  
> costs a lot more than a G4, yet, like the G4, it has no future.
> Paul.
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On 6/25/08, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Knowing that several of you use Macs, I am looking for advice.
>>> I am looking at getting a used/refurbished G4 or G5 to use for  
>>> photography
>> ONLY.
>>> I know I want a big external drive for storage backup, but what  
>>> about
>>> internal main drive ?
>>
>> I haven't priced them recently, but a decent dual-processor G5  
>> machine
>> was going for as much as a used Intel iMac last time I looked. Like
>> Godfrey, I would not recommend getting a G4 at this point in time.
>>
>> I'm happy with my dual 2.5 Ghz G5 tower, but if I were to do it  
>> again,
>> I'd take the same money and put it into an Intel Core 2 Duo based
>> iMac. Performance-wise, it'll beat the G5 in most tasks, except maybe
>> those requiring serious graphics speed, like video rendering. The
>> Intel macs are also more future-proof, as rumors that I've heard is
>> that the OSX 10.6 release will be Intel only.
>>
>> Be warned, if you do get a G5 tower, they tend to suck a LOT of  
>> power.
>> I need to upgrade the UPS I have mine plugged into (APC 700VA unit)
>> because it doesn't have enough capacity to run the the machine 
>> +monitor
>> for more than 2 minutes.
>>
>> -Mat
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
>> and follow
>> the directions.
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to