It's enough for their purposes. They're not going to feature an unaware visitor in an ad or depict him in a bad way. It's just covering their butt in case he ends up in the background of a photo. Paul On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:33 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Well that's certainly a one way agreement they're assuming. I > wonder if > they think that simply posting it is enough. > > Cory Waters wrote: >> We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on >> the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there >> later >> on. Then I noticed this little tidbit tucked away on the bottom >> of the >> page: >> *Photography & Videography* >> Visitor agrees not to commercially use any photography or >> reproduction >> in any form taken during any visits to Zoo Atlanta, and visitor >> grants >> permission to the Zoo Atlanta and its agent to utilize Visitor's >> image, >> likeness and/or sound recordings for the purpose whatsoever in >> perpetuity. >> >> Holy crap... I can understand the first part but sheesh that second >> half is a doozie. >> >> CW >> >> >> > > > -- > Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... > -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
