That's just a cover their ass statement. If you happen to end up in a photo or recording that the zoo produces for publicity or educational purposes, you can't demand payment. They have to do it. Too many people out there who will hit them up for money at the click of a shutter. Paul On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Cory Waters wrote:
> We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on > the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there > later > on. Then I noticed this little tidbit tucked away on the bottom of > the > page: > *Photography & Videography* > Visitor agrees not to commercially use any photography or reproduction > in any form taken during any visits to Zoo Atlanta, and visitor grants > permission to the Zoo Atlanta and its agent to utilize Visitor's > image, > likeness and/or sound recordings for the purpose whatsoever in > perpetuity. > > Holy crap... I can understand the first part but sheesh that second > half is a doozie. > > CW > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
