I think the first part violates fare use doctrine as well. Rebekah wrote: > that can't be legal.... > > rg2 > > On 6/19/08, Cory Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on >> the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there later >> on. Then I noticed this little tidbit tucked away on the bottom of the >> page: >> *Photography & Videography* >> Visitor agrees not to commercially use any photography or reproduction >> in any form taken during any visits to Zoo Atlanta, and visitor grants >> permission to the Zoo Atlanta and its agent to utilize Visitor's image, >> likeness and/or sound recordings for the purpose whatsoever in perpetuity. >> >> Holy crap... I can understand the first part but sheesh that second >> half is a doozie. >> >> CW >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > >
-- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
