I agree. Plus, it is a lot more compact. However, it does suck up a LOT of light. I have to try the clear one at some time.
Walt On 6/17/08, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not that this is the reason you posted these two shots, but the Lightsphere > exposure is more to my liking. > > Jack > > > --- On Tue, 6/17/08, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Lightsphere vs Lumiquest > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 5:40 PM > > Paul's thread got me to thinking. I have a Lightsphere, > > the cloudy > > looking version. I have tried it on the Sigma 500 flash > > with poor > > results that I attribute to P-TTL. May be wrong. > > Anyway, today I purchased a Vivitar 283 and put the velcro > > on it to > > attach my Lumiquest bounce hood. The initial tests reminded > > my again > > why I liked the Vivitar and Sunpak flash units with the > > simple auto > > feature. > > Then I decided to see how the Lightsphere would react. Not > > bad, but > > there are some subtle differences between the two. The > > attached > > photo's show. I believe each is captioned to show which > > was which. > > > > Walt > > > > http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#315094136_KwVvH-XL-LB > > > > http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#315094132_wiZxw-XL-LB > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > > directly above and follow the directions. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
