Rebekah wrote:
>> Are you happy with the results?
>>     
>
> Not really.  For the most part, they look <almost> good, a few will
> need to be inverted (scanned backwards), and a couple were obviously
> too much color saturation for their machine to handle, and most were a
> bit blown out on the highlights with a lack of saturation.
>
> I've uploaded a few for you to see, with a comparison between some I
> scanned myself on someone else's machine when I had a chance.  My
> scans aren't perfect, but I'm satisfied they are fairly close to the
> original picture so you can see the difference between their scan and
> the way it should look.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/CostcoOrNo?authkey=GjfBMt1vHyM
>
> rg2
>   


As Amy Winehouse says, "they wanted me to go to Costco, I said NO NO NO"

D

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to