That's no doubt the "why". I actually wondered about the hasty timing when it was announced in the Feb Pop Photo that the March issue would carry a full review of a production model. I'm sure a little time will produce more reviews than we care to read.
Jack --- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jack Davis wrote: > > Can't say why, but the Pop Photo test seemed "rushed" and > incomplete. > > Given the lead time of print magazines and the recent introduction of > > this camera, I don't see how it could have been otherwise. I do find > the > fact that they *wanted* to get this news out immediately (and on the > cover) encouraging. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
