Yeah, I read this article today. As I recall, the dynamic range was to have been increased by 200%, but the review didn't gush over its shadow/high light performance. Noise was not a rave item nor was the 3 fps frame rate. AF speed was rated "fast" which may have been partially due to the tested 16~50 f/2.8 attached. Resolution was a very satisfying rave item which may just do it for me. I'll be looking for more reactions.
Jack --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if anyone else has seen this yet. Nice review of the > camera and the new DA* 16-50. Very complementary, though at odds > with a > smaller article that used the K20 as an example of how good High ISO > digital has become, (and that it finally has surpassed Film in it's > last > technological bastion). The cover headline by the way is "The > Supercameras arrive" All in all it was a pleasant afternoon in B&N > drinking overpriced coffee and catching up on magazines the library > doesn't stock. > > -- > I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. > A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. > When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world > -- Anonymous > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
