On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:11:48PM -0500, Scott Loveless wrote: > Perry Pellechia wrote: > > Here is the original post archived for all eternity: > > > > http://web.archive.org/web/20040219184659/www.kenrockwell.com/pentax/istD.htm > > > > Where he admits: > > > > "I haven't played with it. I will presume image quality is the same as > > the other real DSLRs like the Nikon D100 and Canon 10D, and far > > superior to compact non-SLRs like the Sony DSC-F828 and other > > point-and shoots." > > > > > That's not quite the original. Initially, he never said that it should > be considered. He basically trashed it based on personal bias. Shortly > thereafter there was a little disclaimer at the top about the "fan mail" > he received concerning his "review". . . .
Still not quite right. What originally showed up after the negative mail wasn't "a little disclaimer" - it was a transparently self-serving attempt at justification of his so-called review by an ad-hominem attack on those who had had the effrontery to criticize him. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
