Obviously WW has way too much time on his hands. Proves the point that you can never have too many quotes !
Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PDML Logo stuff now on line > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Roberts" > Subject: Re: PDML Logo stuff now on line > > >> frank theriault wrote: >> >>>On Jan 17, 2008 10:37 AM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> http://www.cafepress.com/robertstech >>>> >>>> The t-shirt has the "Too many lenses" quotation. >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>So you did predictable, eh? You went with the "too many lenses" >>>instead of the actual quote of "to many lenses"? I think the latter, >>>beyond being accurate, is much more reflective of PDML (and by >>>extension, the shirt's wearer). >>> >>>;-) >> >> Unfortunately the quotation is from Bill Robb, not Dave Brooks, so it >> probably *was* spelled correctly in the original. >> Bummer, I know... > >>From Thursday, Feb 10, 2005: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom C" > Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton > > >> Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital >> back for the K and M series. You can't forget about that. > > Lenses are truly where it's at. > You can never have too many lenses.. > >>From Monday, Jan 01, 2007: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joseph Tainter" Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) > > >> Sony is supposed to come with an FF sensor and camera in 2007 >> (supposedly first part of 2007). >> >> ----- >> >> Is anyone else thinking that this is something to consider when deciding >> whether to buy one of the very expensive forthcoming DA* zooms, or any >> other expensive DA lens? > > > It's something to consider, but for me it has been trumped by the needs of > the now. > Right now, APS C sized sensors are what is available to me, so if I want a > particular AOV, I need to buy a focal length that gives me that. Since > what > is available is DA lenses, that is what I am buying to fill those holes. > The only DA lens I have bought that I could have filled with an FA lens is > the DA40. I could have bought the FA43 for a lot more money, but on FF, I > never saw the use for that particular length, so the 40 is a good (and > relatively inexpensive) compromise for a long standard. > There may be a move to 24x36mm sensors in the future, if that happens, > then > I may be in the market for another lens or two. > Or perhaps not, since my short focal length full frame lenses will be wide > angle lenses again > So it goes, one can never have too many lenses. > > >>From Thursday January 18, 2007: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Dausin (PDML)" Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction) > > >> Thanks for the warm welcome! >> >> 'We're known for >> enablement' was truly spoken from the heart! :) >> > > You can never have too many lenses. > > > And finally, from Thursday January 03, 2008: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike wilson" > Subject: Re: Low light prime > > >> >> >>> Somehwere around the house I'm pretty sure I still have an FA50/1.7. >> >> You have too many lenses. > > You can never have too many lenses. > > Apparently, if I think something is worth saying once, I think it worth > repeating. > FWIW, I did a search using the Dave Brooks spelling method and got no > hits > at all. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
