----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: PDML Logo stuff now on line
> frank theriault wrote: > >>On Jan 17, 2008 10:37 AM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> http://www.cafepress.com/robertstech >>> >>> The t-shirt has the "Too many lenses" quotation. >> >><snip> >> >>So you did predictable, eh? You went with the "too many lenses" >>instead of the actual quote of "to many lenses"? I think the latter, >>beyond being accurate, is much more reflective of PDML (and by >>extension, the shirt's wearer). >> >>;-) > > Unfortunately the quotation is from Bill Robb, not Dave Brooks, so it > probably *was* spelled correctly in the original. > Bummer, I know... >From Thursday, Feb 10, 2005: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton > Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital > back for the K and M series. You can't forget about that. Lenses are truly where it's at. You can never have too many lenses.. >From Monday, Jan 01, 2007: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Tainter" Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) > Sony is supposed to come with an FF sensor and camera in 2007 > (supposedly first part of 2007). > > ----- > > Is anyone else thinking that this is something to consider when deciding > whether to buy one of the very expensive forthcoming DA* zooms, or any > other expensive DA lens? It's something to consider, but for me it has been trumped by the needs of the now. Right now, APS C sized sensors are what is available to me, so if I want a particular AOV, I need to buy a focal length that gives me that. Since what is available is DA lenses, that is what I am buying to fill those holes. The only DA lens I have bought that I could have filled with an FA lens is the DA40. I could have bought the FA43 for a lot more money, but on FF, I never saw the use for that particular length, so the 40 is a good (and relatively inexpensive) compromise for a long standard. There may be a move to 24x36mm sensors in the future, if that happens, then I may be in the market for another lens or two. Or perhaps not, since my short focal length full frame lenses will be wide angle lenses again So it goes, one can never have too many lenses. >From Thursday January 18, 2007: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dausin (PDML)" Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction) > Thanks for the warm welcome! > > 'We're known for > enablement' was truly spoken from the heart! :) > You can never have too many lenses. And finally, from Thursday January 03, 2008: ----- Original Message ----- From: "mike wilson" Subject: Re: Low light prime > > >> Somehwere around the house I'm pretty sure I still have an FA50/1.7. > > You have too many lenses. You can never have too many lenses. Apparently, if I think something is worth saying once, I think it worth repeating. FWIW, I did a search using the Dave Brooks spelling method and got no hits at all. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
