Both nice shots. I think #1 shows a bit of meat on her upper body and does leaves open some uncertainty about her waist. #2 is more complimentary, but dark near side doesn't answer the total figure question.
Jack --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's portfolio this > afternoon. At 5'91/2". size 4, she says she was too short and too > hefty for New York. (They want 5'11", size 2!). But she's doing well > > in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just started looking > through them. These are okay. > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602862 > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602865 > Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
