Paul Stenquist wrote: > Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's portfolio this > afternoon. At 5'91/2". size 4, she says she was too short and too > hefty for New York. (They want 5'11", size 2!). But she's doing well > in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just started looking > through them. These are okay. > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602862 > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602865 > Paul > > Good one, Paul. She's a bit of a find.
I much prefer the first to the second. Lovely relaxed pose. Only one small suggestion, keeping the tip of her nose within the line of her cheek would make her 3/4 that much more compact. The second is a touch too strained. Her lips are a bit pursed, and there is the odd position of her feet. Her modern working woman outfit would benefit from a more open stride. Hair is also a bit out of control for the outfit. And your clock is a few hours slow :) Post more, please. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
