It's free. If you're a masochist, the source code is public, so you can modify it yourself.
Steve Desjardins wrote: > I've heard of this program but never used it. What are it's > advantages? > > And yes, I did go to the website. It's promises much, as do those I > vote for. > > >>>> graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/25/2007 11:12 AM >>> >>>> > Not real clear in the release notes: > > http://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.4.html > > Of course if you are primarily interested in web images 16 bit (usually > 10 or 12 > bits per pixel + padding actually) does not make a lot of difference. > The price > (free) is certainly right. > > > Scott Loveless wrote: > >> Doug Franklin wrote: >> >>> For those of you using Linux, or interested in an alternative to >>> Photoshop, version 2.4 of The Gimp was announced today. >>> >>> It finally added support for 16-bit color (48 bits per pixel) and >>> > color > >>> management. Those were two of the main problems with using it for >>> digital photography. >>> >>> >> FWIW, the GIMP still does not support 16 bit color management. You >> > can > >> work with 16 and 32 bit bmp images, and there is rudimentary color >> management. But you can't have both just yet. >> http://www.cinepaint.org/ might be a better option at this point, >> > though > >> it's really intended for video. >> >> >> > > -- The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team. -- P. J. O'Roark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
