But it's extensible using LISP, how could that be bad?

Adam Maas wrote:
> Actually it's just ingrained muscle memory, years of having to use vi 
> while maintaining services on Unix machines means that the basic editing 
> commands are pretty much automatic. vi is ideal for that use, it's 
> lightweight and everything has it.
>
> I still :wq on a regular basis in just about every other editor/word 
> processor.
>
> If you want punishment, use emacs. All the weight of Word, none of the 
> Eye Candy.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>   
>> You are a glutton for punishment...
>>
>> Adam Maas wrote:
>>     
>>> I use vi
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>> Always the odd one out.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> It'll likely be a matter of attrition.  What % of people here use 
>>>> WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
>>>>
>>>> I'll bet it's a 5/95 ratio if not higher.  Not too different from where 
>>>> Pentax stands in the market, despite some recent relative success with the 
>>>> K10D.
>>>>
>>>> Your suppositions are probably correct.  When I say done for, I'm not 
>>>> predicting when... I'm saying that inevitable market forces will finally 
>>>> take their toll, unless something changes quickly.
>>>>
>>>> Tom C.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
>>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? Pentax has never been a player in the Pro 35mm market. Not being
>>>>> one now will make little difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> I expect to see them bring out a body above the K10D within the next 6
>>>>> months, or a K10D 'successor' that is little more than the new Sony 12MP
>>>>> sensor and a new shutter in the K10D body, perhaps with a higher
>>>>> framerate. I don't expect to see a Pentax body above the $1300 or so
>>>>> price point.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> LOL.  You're not breaking it to me.  I was being kind. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pentax has a slim chance yet to recover.  If they blow it in the next 6 
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> - 12
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> months though, I susect they are done for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> To: "pdml" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> Subject: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:59:17 -0400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hate to break it to you, but in the USA, Pentax *is* a "2nd tier 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> camera
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> company".  The company hasn't released a truly professional system 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> camera
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> here (or anywhere, actually) since the LX.  The current high-end Pentax
>>>>>>> lens
>>>>>>> selection is miniscule compared to Canon and Nikon.  Pentax does not
>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>> the kind of professional support that Canon and Nikon do at major 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> sporting
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> events.  Pentax products lack presence on store shelves in the USA.  
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>> Etc.
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: "John Sessoms"
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under 
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>> NDA)
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>> If memory serves the other two are an over-priced Nissan and an
>>>>>>>>>> over-priced Honda.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>> I guess that depends on what your personal comfort is worth.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> William Robb
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige,
>>>>>>>> perception in the market place.  Sure a FF DSLR will cost more
>>>>>>>> than one with an APS-C size sensor.  If the Canons, Nikon's,
>>>>>>>> Sony's of the world offer FF DSLR's, then Pentax must also.
>>>>>>>> If they do not, they will relegate themselves to a 2nd
>>>>>>>> tier camera company, and it doesn't matter who loves their
>>>>>>>> camera, or how much it satisfies their current needs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to