On Oct 15, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:

> This is valid argument. However, I cannot spend both time and effort,
> *and* the money each time there is a change of format that requires
> all my lenses and bodies to be replaced. In fact, given the mount
> compatibility of Pentax, it is only natural to try to stick to those
> lenses that are proven and do work.

There is no reason to upgrade every time technology changes. To do so  
is absurd, unless there is either significant advantage from which  
you will garner income or simply have a lot of discretionary income  
to burn on luxuries. If you have a camera and buy a very good lens  
well matched to it that produces the results you want, you can use  
that setup until it stops working entirely, bypassing generations of  
new equipment at no cost.

If you want an ultrawide lens for the DSLR bodies, buy a DA series  
lens. They're the best, if not only, choices available that make  
sense. It's that simple. The DA12-24, DA14, DA16-45, DA*16-50, and  
DA21 Limited are all excellent wide lenses available now that work  
brilliantly on the DSLR bodies. Lenses 20mm and shorter that were  
made for 35mm SLRs in days gone by may or may not perform as well,  
and beyond that they're just as expensive as any of these choices.

If and when some better body comes available and *if* it includes a  
larger format sensor that cannot work with the lens you have,  
evaluate then whether or not the improvements it offers warrant the  
expense of buying it and a new lens as needed.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to