The send out is cheaper too.
Scott Loveless wrote:
> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>> Anyway, in the years we have done this, our results with print
>> processing have been very good. I wish they would offer good B&W
>> print C-41 processing, though. Those two rolls with the purplish
>> tint disappointed me. Perhaps print B&W C-41 is just too strange an
>> animal? I have been thinking of leaving my color print processing to
>> W-M, and trying A&I mailers for my B&W prints. Overall, their prices
>> are rather high (though not more than the "pro" shops), but since
>> they charge only $1.50 a roll more for traditional print B&W ($15.50
>> vs. $17.00), I may opt for that. I have heard that their work is
>> excellent ("Old Grumpy" had endorsed them). I welcome any further
>> thoughts.
>>
> I've had inconsistent results with Wal-Mart's in house processing.
> Thus, everything goes into their send-out bin, even the C-41 stuff. It
> seems that quality is variable by store and by staff. Fuji is much more
> consistent. Basically, if you put your film in one of their 1-hour
> envelopes they're going to process it in the store. As far as I can
> tell, anything that's not in a 1-hour envelope goes to Fuji and takes a
> few days, at least. Perhaps Bill can confirm this.
>
> C-41 B&W is tricky and most mini-labs don't do it well. Wal-Mart, as
> well as Target, Costco, Rite-Aid, etc., are probably going to print it
> on the same paper they print everything else on. You're going to have a
> color cast. I used to send film to a mail order outfit called Clark
> Color (I believe they're affiliated with York Photo). They would print
> C-41 B&W and traditional B&W on traditional black and white paper. They
> have since gone to a production inkjet system that really sucks. Your
> best bet is to get a scanner and scan/print the stuff yourself.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
