Well, yes, I hear what Mark, Godfrey and you are saying. But consider the FAJ lenses. Although very short living (are they still produced?) and with just 3 lenses - they were still full frame (proper) lenses that did't have an aperture ring...
Indeed, this is confusing. In fact, if anyone of us who has these DA lenses (40, 70) would care for a (as much as I dislike this term) full frame test, it would be most helpful. OTOH, it is known that DA 21 does *not* cover the full frame. Go figure... Boris William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Liberman" > Subject: Re: DA70 and 24x36 coverage > > >> I am asking my question mainly because if it indeed covered full frame >> and there were no image deterioration past the APC frame, Pentax >> probably would have given it FDA designation instead of DA. >> > > I think they would have had to put an aperture ring on it for the D-FA > designation. Thats probably got more to do with why it is a DA lens than > anything else about it. > > William Robb > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
