Note that Fuji sells Superia 800 as a pro film as well, called Press 800. It's the same stuff (in fact the only difference is the 'Pro' version is 36exp and the consumer 24)
I'm very fond of that film, it's probably 50% or more of the colour 35mm I shoot. 400 is nice, but lacks the personality of the 800. -Adam Glen Tortorella wrote: > I agree, Adam. That Fuji Superia 800 is one fine 800 speed film. I > just bought a five-pack of the Superia 400, and I expect it be nice, > too. > > Glen > > On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:55 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > >> In non-pro form, Fuji is where it's at. The only Kodak print films's >> I'll shoot are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro' >> films. >> >> Glen Tortorella wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Among the less expensive, "non-pro" print films, which do you prefer, >>> Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am >>> wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 >>> speeds offered by both brands. >>> >>> Glen >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
