BTW Glen - I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji or kodak gold, and I really feel like the Fuji outperforms the Kodak in low light situations. Its contrast and grain hold up even when I'm taking dim indoor pictures at 1/30 or even 1/4s. I like Kodak much better in outdoor light but I have to say I'm always disappointed by it when the light isn't perfect.
rg2 On 9/29/07, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Owens wrote: > > When I could get it, I shot Agfa 200. Otherwise I shot Fuji Superia 200, > > though I think Kodak Gold 200 is also excellent. I liked Agfa because it > > seemed to render neutral colors more naturally. > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > Has anyone seen the resurrected Agfafilm in the flesh? Doesn't look like > they are resurrecting Portrait or Ultra though :( > > http://www.lupus-imaging-media.com/content/blogcategory/16/31/lang,en/ > > D > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
