Lost it the 1st time I think... Fuji used to (still may), generally, have a slight edge in resolution and grain.
I prefer a 100 speed film and tripod, over a higher ISO film, unless circumstances dictate not using a tripod. Fuji Reala, costs more and available only at Photo stores, always seemed to produce superior results. Otherwise, I still preferred Fuji Superia to Kodak Gold (who knows what they're called now). Tom C. >From: Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Fuji or Kodak? >Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:05:31 -0400 > >Hi all, > >Among the less expensive, "non-pro" print films, which do you prefer, >Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am >wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 >speeds offered by both brands. > >Glen > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
