I really like my 16-45. I recommend it Dave
On 9/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would go for the DA* 16-50/2.8. That extra stop means a lot in low light > interiors. One of these days (as in when I have the money), I'm going to put > my DA 16-45 up on ebay and order one. > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > BTW . . . A data point to follow up the speculation. > > > > We had this discussion about travel kits before I went to London. In > > reality, I used the FA 20-35 (virtually) exclusively. I guess I really > > need to get the DA 16-45 and solve all my travel choices. I used to be > > such a fan of short telephotos but I guess I've done more travel > > photography lately and the wide to normal zooms seem to always work. > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow > > the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
