that's why they're evil ;) On 9/21/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's hard to shoot egrets, they're very white and yours shows no detail > in the feathers at all. > > Rebekah wrote: > > nice! I love that purple-looking water...where did you take that > > picture? The water around here is brown...;) here's one of mine, I > > just had it rejected from the gallery. They must have known it was > > evil. > > > > http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5112635158088756322 > > > > rg2 > > > > On 9/21/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Rebekah wrote: > >> > >> > >>>> How do you tell a bad egret from a good one? > >>>> > >>> the bad ones show up as blown out on the pictures ;) therefore, I've > >>> concluded that they're all evil. > >>> > >> Har! > >> > >> This must be a good one, but just barely: > >> http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/7d400403.htm > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Remember, it's pillage then burn. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
