have you had a chance to try that on someone else's scanner? That looks interesting
rg2 On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/09/2007, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > wait, if you could decrease the distance between the sensor and the > > film, would the average be more accurate? What if pixels were a > > different shape, like hexagons? Would it look better? > > The little device bellow may ease the grain pain: > > http://www.scanhancer.com/ > > I'm having one customized for my LS-8000 > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
