How many hours did you spend fixing your washer?  I replaced every 
important sensor and a switch, (essentially rebuilding the electrical 
system), in less that two hours.  Most of that was figuring out how to 
take the back off.

Tom C wrote:
> I think the new technology is often easily repairable.  It's just that most 
> of the electronics is now manufactured overseas and it's incredibly cheap.  
> A company makes more profit replacing an entire circuit board that costs $20 
> and charging $250 + 1 hour labor, than they do trouble shooting the board 
> for an hour and replacing $.10 and $1.00 parts. For the company, time is 
> money. Also, the customer unable to diagnose othe problem, is happy just to 
> get the serviceman in and out.
>
> Tom C.
>
>   
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
>> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:40:39 -0400
>>
>> Front loads have been around for a long time, even here.  The old
>> technology is much easier to repair, and usually costs less than new
>> electronic devices, which seem to designed to not be repaired.
>>
>> Tom C wrote:
>>     
>>> Well I don't claim to be a rocket scientist.  It usually take me 2 or 3
>>> trips to the parts store or tool store before I get things right because 
>>>       
>> I
>>     
>>> learn as I go.  I was happy to have saved at least $325.
>>>
>>> Two advantages of the newer front load washers (long popular in Europe 
>>>       
>> and
>>     
>>> only becoming popular in the USA over the last decade for home use) is 
>>>       
>> that
>>     
>>> they use about 1/3 the water as older top load washers and are much 
>>>       
>> easier
>>     
>>> on clothes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom C.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
>>>> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:49:04 -0400
>>>>
>>>> And it drys cloths no better than the 30 year old dryer I bought for
>>>> $25.00 12 years ago, and fixed for less than $10.  Replacing all of the
>>>> temperature sensors and door switch in less than two hours.  (I ended 
>>>>         
>> up
>>     
>>>> giving it away 6 months ago as I had no place to store it).
>>>>
>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> What all these problems really indicate is how cheap, low-spec most
>>>>>> of the electronic components being used are, even in high-end
>>>>>> cameras. Curiously, my 1966 RCA transistor radio that cost me $20
>>>>>> (expensive back then!) is still going strong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Godfrey
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Likely planned obsolescence?
>>>>>
>>>>> On a side note, I just fixed our 2000 Maytag Neptune washer which had
>>>>> stopped spinning clothes in the spin cycle.  If it had failed about 
>>>>>           
>> two
>>     
>>>> yeas
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> ago I could have gotten it fixed for free under the terms of a class
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> action
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> lawsuit.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was going to cost upwards of $400 for a service call, an entire new
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> main
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> control board, and an item called a wax motor which is essential to
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> locking
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> the door. I replaced the wax motor (ultimate source of the problem)
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> along
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> with a blown resistor and two transistors on the main board.  In the
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> process
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I ruined a metal 'leaf' spring that holds the wax motor in place and
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> super
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> glued a switch closed, until the new parts arrived. Cost of my repair
>>>>> including parts which I runied in the process was under $75 dollars,
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> though
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I have about 10 hours invested in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a 
>>>>         
>> dog.
>>     
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to