I think the new technology is often easily repairable.  It's just that most 
of the electronics is now manufactured overseas and it's incredibly cheap.  
A company makes more profit replacing an entire circuit board that costs $20 
and charging $250 + 1 hour labor, than they do trouble shooting the board 
for an hour and replacing $.10 and $1.00 parts. For the company, time is 
money. Also, the customer unable to diagnose othe problem, is happy just to 
get the serviceman in and out.

Tom C.

>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
>Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:40:39 -0400
>
>Front loads have been around for a long time, even here.  The old
>technology is much easier to repair, and usually costs less than new
>electronic devices, which seem to designed to not be repaired.
>
>Tom C wrote:
> > Well I don't claim to be a rocket scientist.  It usually take me 2 or 3
> > trips to the parts store or tool store before I get things right because 
>I
> > learn as I go.  I was happy to have saved at least $325.
> >
> > Two advantages of the newer front load washers (long popular in Europe 
>and
> > only becoming popular in the USA over the last decade for home use) is 
>that
> > they use about 1/3 the water as older top load washers and are much 
>easier
> > on clothes.
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
> >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:49:04 -0400
> >>
> >> And it drys cloths no better than the 30 year old dryer I bought for
> >> $25.00 12 years ago, and fixed for less than $10.  Replacing all of the
> >> temperature sensors and door switch in less than two hours.  (I ended 
>up
> >> giving it away 6 months ago as I had no place to store it).
> >>
> >> Tom C wrote:
> >>
> >>>> What all these problems really indicate is how cheap, low-spec most
> >>>> of the electronic components being used are, even in high-end
> >>>> cameras. Curiously, my 1966 RCA transistor radio that cost me $20
> >>>> (expensive back then!) is still going strong.
> >>>>
> >>>> Godfrey
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Likely planned obsolescence?
> >>>
> >>> On a side note, I just fixed our 2000 Maytag Neptune washer which had
> >>> stopped spinning clothes in the spin cycle.  If it had failed about 
>two
> >>>
> >> yeas
> >>
> >>> ago I could have gotten it fixed for free under the terms of a class
> >>>
> >> action
> >>
> >>> lawsuit.
> >>>
> >>> It was going to cost upwards of $400 for a service call, an entire new
> >>>
> >> main
> >>
> >>> control board, and an item called a wax motor which is essential to
> >>>
> >> locking
> >>
> >>> the door. I replaced the wax motor (ultimate source of the problem)
> >>>
> >> along
> >>
> >>> with a blown resistor and two transistors on the main board.  In the
> >>>
> >> process
> >>
> >>> I ruined a metal 'leaf' spring that holds the wax motor in place and
> >>>
> >> super
> >>
> >>> glued a switch closed, until the new parts arrived. Cost of my repair
> >>> including parts which I runied in the process was under $75 dollars,
> >>>
> >> though
> >>
> >>> I have about 10 hours invested in it.
> >>>
> >>> Tom C.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a 
>dog.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to