Rob, I worked for a former UNIVAC computer salesman. He always insisted on pointing out that the computers the company used for daily order processing were not obsolete, they were just superceded...the market had something newer/better. That's how I feel about my Pentax gear. You can supercede it, but making it obsolete will take time and effort. And given the legacy glass out there, bodies will be made to fill the needs. (Remember, the electronics guys don't make any money on the glass. They want to sell more electronics, not glass.) Regards, Bob S.
On 5/20/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm just tired of all those who spend so much time watching the sky > > to see if it's falling. If I were inclined to dump my Pentax gear, I > > would do it now. But I'm not going to. It works quite well, thank > > you. A yawn is appropriate. > > It's not really, this is a conversation about Pentax on a Pentax > discussion list. Try to exercise just a little empathy, granted > Pentax's future is not entirely clear at the moment. However consider > for just a moment that some others here may not be made of money and > may have had to save and sacrifice to buy into the Pentax system and > as such are simply concerned that it may not have a future. Surely > scenarios are worth discussion. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
