Better image quality for printing, yes. That is why I
would want a larger sensor. Low noise would be another
benefit. And I can see a difference in downsized
images on the web. There is a perceptible difference.

-Brendan
--- Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My point is that the advantage of a larger sensor is
> less noise and
> the ability to print at a larger size (more
> mpixels), so unless you
> need the clean high ISO I doubt that you can tell
> the difference
> between downsized images for the web coming from a
> FF camera and a
> APS-C camera, any extra resolution advantage is lost
> in the downsizing
> process, don't you think? Otherwise I don't
> understand why you want a
> FF size sensor? Maybe the difference that you are
> seen have to do with
> glass and postprocessing?
> 
> On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is an idea that I never tried, take a raw
> photo
> > > with the k10d,
> > > process as 10Mb, 6Mb and 2Mb. Downsize every
> jpeg to
> > > half the size of
> > > the 2Mb photo. See any difference?
> >
> >
> > No, I haven't done that either. But why would I?
> > Wouldn't that only show relative resolutions at
> > different quailities of the same sensor? I need to
> get
> > a hold of a camera with a different sensor and run
> it
> > through it's paces and see if I notice a
> difference.
> >
> > -Brendan
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On 5/10/07, Brendan MacRae
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On May 10, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Brendan MacRae
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  I talk to him all the time and he's
> really
> > > > > craving the
> > > > > > quality that he's seeing from guys on his
> > > Canon
> > > > > > forums. I've subscribed myself to one and
> have
> > > > > seen
> > > > > > some of this work and it blows me away.
> Much
> > > of it
> > > > > > looks like MF to me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you've seen prints. Because on the web
> MF
> > > work
> > > > > looks exactly
> > > > > like APS-C sensor work. They're all just
> itty
> > > bitty
> > > > > images.
> > > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > All I can say is what I've seen on the web. To
> my
> > > eye
> > > > it appears vastly improved over what I see
> with
> > > the
> > > > smaller sensor cameras. It has a pop that just
> > > isn't
> > > > there with my stuff (inviting all now to
> simply
> > > say
> > > > it's my lousy photo skills vs.
> gear...<groan>).
> > > >
> > > > It's been enough to prompt me to see about
> renting
> > > one
> > > > to check it out for myself.
> > > >
> > > > -Brendan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning
> protection.
> > > > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > TV dinner still cooling?
> > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
> > http://tv.yahoo.com/
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to