Completing the information:

Of course, It's not guaranteed and it's not valid for all DA lenses.

Cassio

On 5/10/07, Cassio Vogel Dorneles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read somewhere some DA lenses could even be used with (obviously
> FF) film cameras. Unfortunately, I've lost the source :-(
>
> Cassio (Hi, I'm new here)
>
> On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That could happen. I would imagine that the DA lenses were designed with 
> > some room for sensor expansion.
> > Paul
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can
> > > > be sure it will work with DA lenses. They wouldn't
> > > > be introducing a full line of expensive lenses for
> > > > cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely a
> > > > no go.
> > > > Paul
> > >
> > > That's a good point, Paul. I was thinking about that
> > > last night. Couple this with the press release and it
> > > seems that a FF camera is most likely not in the
> > > cards...at least not right away. The lens map hasn't
> > > pointed to anything much larger in sensors, that can't
> > > be argued. Unless of course they pull a new body/new
> > > lenses release thing as they done many times in the
> > > past. But I'm not holding my breath.
> > >
> > > But how about a K1D with a APS-H sized sensor like in
> > > the new Mark III? That could be cool, plus the boost
> > > in pixels.
> > >
> > > -Brendan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >  -------------- Original message
> > > > ----------------------
> > > > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Digital Image Studio wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >But they just can't go on increasing the density
> > > > of APS sized sensor
> > > > > >ad infinitum, it will only end in tears.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's true. If the K1D is 14 megapixels as
> > > > reported, it'll certainly
> > > > > have to have a larger sensor than APS-C if they're
> > > > going to meet users'
> > > > > (ever-increasing) demands for low noise. (I would
> > > > expect around a 1.3
> > > > > crop to keep it usable with current DA lenses.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a sobering statistic I just read:
> > > > > Even if Canon pushes the upcoming 1Ds-III up to 22
> > > > megapixels as
> > > > > rumored it will still have *lower* pixel density
> > > > (that is, larger
> > > > > pixels) than the Nikon D2x does *now* at 12
> > > > megapixels.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
> --
> Cassio Vogel Dorneles
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-- 
Cassio Vogel Dorneles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to