C my later reply
On 5/9/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I definitely agree. Less impact without it. > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:48 PM > Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures and PESO > > > > That's part of what I think makes the image, the little knoll with the > > pine > > trees in the foreground, in front of the expansive view. :-) > > > > Thanks for your comments. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >>From: "Fernando Terrazzino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > >>Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures and PESO > >>Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:24:24 -0400 > >> > >>My subjective opinion ;-) > >> > >>When I opened the image the first thing I looked was the pine tree (is > >>that pine?) on the lower left part of the image. Might be your > >>intention, but that's what bugs me, if that tree was not there I would > >>like the image better, the photo has an interesting "triangle" shape > >>in the bottom (the one defined by the group of trees in the lower > >>part) the fog separates these trees from the other formation of trees > >>that are in the middle right, and the horizon is nice, although I > >>wouldn't bother seen a touch more of sky. > >> > >>So in mi opinion, nice shapes formed be the trees, would like it > >>better without the pine tree on the lower left. It's probably a nice > >>photo to see large rather than in a postcard. > >> > >>You get an "A -" ;o) > >> > >> > >>On 5/9/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Here's a photo I've been debating adding to my portfolio for a long > >>time. > >> > > >> > It's not a knock-your-socks-off kind of image, but I find it appealing > >> > nevertheless. I'm considering using it in a collection of greeting > >>cards... > >> > going with my "Unnoticed Idaho" theme. > >> > > >> > So what does the group think, and why? > >> > > >> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720249&size=lg > >> > > >> > > >> > Tom C. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >I'm my own worst critic and a pretty ruthless one at that. My > >>editing > >> > > >is pretty harsh and goes something like this: "crap, crap, crap, > >>crap, > >> > > >meh, crap, WHAT WAS I DOING?, good, crap, crap, good, good, crap..." > >> > > >what I consider crap, others may consider "good enough." For > >>example, > >> > > >if something isn't perfectly sharp where I want it to be perfectly > >> > > >sharp, it doesn't get a second chance, regardless of the subject > >>(unless > >> > > >it is a super rare species and I won't get another chance to > >>photograph > >> > > >it). > >> > > > > >> > > >Christian > >> > > >http://photography.skofteland.net > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >Good man! That's exactly the same way it goes with me. > >> > > > >> > >The last mistake I made in this area was the "Falling Water" photo > >>which > >> > >some regular commenters had some issues with. It was the best of the > >>40 or > >> > >so shots I had taken that morning and I let my excitement with being > >>there > >> > >and actually viewing the scene pollute my judgement about the > >> > >resulting > >> > >image. > >> > > > >> > >Tom C. > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > >> > >> > >>-- > >> > >>http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ > >> > >>-- > >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>[email protected] > >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
