Tom C wrote: >Here's a photo I've been debating adding to my portfolio for a long time. > >It's not a knock-your-socks-off kind of image, but I find it appealing >nevertheless. I'm considering using it in a collection of greeting cards... >going with my "Unnoticed Idaho" theme. > >So what does the group think, and why? > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720249&size=lg > > >Tom C. > I think it is a lovely greeting card / post card shot - it takes me there which is just what it should do and all the tech stuff looks spot on..
ann > > > >>>I'm my own worst critic and a pretty ruthless one at that. My editing >>>is pretty harsh and goes something like this: "crap, crap, crap, crap, >>>meh, crap, WHAT WAS I DOING?, good, crap, crap, good, good, crap..." >>>what I consider crap, others may consider "good enough." For example, >>>if something isn't perfectly sharp where I want it to be perfectly >>>sharp, it doesn't get a second chance, regardless of the subject (unless >>>it is a super rare species and I won't get another chance to photograph >>>it). >>> >>>Christian >>>http://photography.skofteland.net >>> >>> >>> >>Good man! That's exactly the same way it goes with me. >> >>The last mistake I made in this area was the "Falling Water" photo which >>some regular commenters had some issues with. It was the best of the 40 or >>so shots I had taken that morning and I let my excitement with being there >>and actually viewing the scene pollute my judgement about the resulting >>image. >> >>Tom C. >> >> >> > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
