I don't know. :-) I had skiis on and there was no way to get closer and 
still have the high vantage point. :-)



Tom C.


>From: "Fernando Terrazzino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures and PESO
>Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:59:13 -0400
>
>Shouldn't they be closer then? I see them (the couple of tree in the
>foreground) too small to be important and too large to be noticeable
>(in a sense of a subject) , but well, that's my opinion, I'm not a
>postcard buyer anyway ;-)
>
>On 5/9/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's part of what I think makes the image, the little knoll with the 
>pine
> > trees in the foreground, in front of the expansive view. :-)
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Fernando Terrazzino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > >Subject: Re: Looking at Pictures and PESO
> > >Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:24:24 -0400
> > >
> > >My subjective opinion ;-)
> > >
> > >When I opened the image the first thing I looked was the pine tree (is
> > >that pine?) on the lower left part of the image. Might be your
> > >intention, but that's what bugs me, if that tree was not there I would
> > >like the image better, the photo has an interesting "triangle" shape
> > >in the bottom (the one defined by the group of trees in the lower
> > >part) the fog separates these trees from the other formation of trees
> > >that are in the middle right, and the horizon is nice, although I
> > >wouldn't bother seen a touch more of sky.
> > >
> > >So in mi opinion, nice shapes formed be the trees, would like it
> > >better without the pine tree on the lower left. It's probably a nice
> > >photo to see large rather than in a postcard.
> > >
> > >You get an "A -" ;o)
> > >
> > >
> > >On 5/9/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Here's a photo I've been debating adding to my portfolio for a long
> > >time.
> > > >
> > > > It's not a knock-your-socks-off kind of image, but I find it 
>appealing
> > > > nevertheless.  I'm considering using it in a collection of greeting
> > >cards...
> > > > going with my "Unnoticed Idaho" theme.
> > > >
> > > > So what does the group think, and why?
> > > >
> > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5720249&size=lg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tom C.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I'm my own worst critic and a pretty ruthless one at that.  My
> > >editing
> > > > > >is pretty harsh and goes something like this: "crap, crap, crap,
> > >crap,
> > > > > >meh, crap, WHAT WAS I DOING?, good, crap, crap, good, good, 
>crap..."
> > > > > >what I consider crap, others may consider "good enough."  For
> > >example,
> > > > > >if something isn't perfectly sharp where I want it to be 
>perfectly
> > > > > >sharp, it doesn't get a second chance, regardless of the subject
> > >(unless
> > > > > >it is a super rare species and I won't get another chance to
> > >photograph
> > > > > >it).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Christian
> > > > > >http://photography.skofteland.net
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Good man! That's exactly the same way it goes with me.
> > > > >
> > > > >The last mistake I made in this area was the "Falling Water" photo
> > >which
> > > > >some regular commenters had some issues with.  It was the best of 
>the
> > >40 or
> > > > >so shots I had taken that morning and I let my excitement with 
>being
> > >there
> > > > >and actually viewing the scene pollute my judgement about the 
>resulting
> > > > >image.
> > > > >
> > > > >Tom C.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >
> > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/
> > >
> > >--
> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
>--
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to