In a message dated 5/1/2007 9:09:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see that often here on the list and elsewhere. Photography for photography's sake is often disappointing.
Tom C. =========== However, this is my passion. And it's not just anti-development, per se. Although some of that will be in my series. I am not going for the easy cliche. So often nature is all around us, but we ignore it. Side by side, at least in this county, with a housing development or something else. But we feel we have to travel to capture it and while it's right here. Just a look away. So some of that will be in my series. Another aspect is that nature and man-made sometimes co-exist quite happily side by side, such as many of our animals have become urbanized (because they have had to, sure, but some populations are rebounding). We also make too many distinctions about what is a landscape shot and what is an urban shot. Etc., etc., etc. I don't have just one point. But I take your comments to mean you found my first two photos rather lackluster. That's fine. :-) Later, Marnie aka Doe ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
