Indeed it does. All those bokehs look fine to me. :-)

I would guess that John's bad bokeh is an anomaly of the particular 
circumstances and conditons when the shot was taken .


Tom C.



>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
>Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:10:28 -0600
>
>I promised Tom C that I would try to do a bokeh comparison between the
>A85/1.4, M85/2, FA77 and DA70 lenses.
>I had a few moments between supper and getting bombed, so here goes:
>
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/m852bokeh/852bokeh.html
>
>I set up using the 85/1.4 with the intention of leaving the camera
>stationary, and cropping the images from the shorter lenses. I felt it best
>for comparative purposes if the camera: subject/background ratio stayed the
>same.
>I didn't go to extremes regarding matching densities, I used one of the
>85/1.4 files as a reference and used the middle levels slider to get them
>close.
>
>As I expected, the M85/2 stands up very well compared to the much newer, 
>and
>much more expensive glass.
>
>Enjoy
>
>William Robb
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to