Hi Graywolf, Maybe the appropriate definition is "more versatile" rather than "better". I think of digital as being far more versatile than film. More versatile means there are more chances it can better suit someone's needs (about shooting and editing pictures). That's my case for sure. For a number of reasons, without digital I would not have taken say 90% of the pictures I took over the last three years. For a number of reasons, many of those pictures could not turn out as good as they are (from the technical point of view), if taken on film. That works a lot for me.
So you can take as good examples of your question say 90% of the pictures you can see there: http://www.dariobonazza.com/padovae.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/verone.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/bodym04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/gianna04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/trig05e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/enter05e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/amm05e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/amm06e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/bris04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/pal04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/rec05e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/sam05e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/cervia04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/climb04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/vetri04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/pkp04e.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/freccee.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/katendee.htm http://www.dariobonazza.com/misce.htm Which of course are just a few of the pictures I took since I've switched to digital in late 2003. On the other hand, I'm no longer interested on the "film vs. digital" debate, as for sure digital doesn't need my support to win the market challenge. In any case, I have truly nothing against film and against all those shooting film. IMO they can well continue enjoying shooting film forever, if that suits their needs. Why not? Has motorboating killed sailing? Almost, but not actually. Have cars killed horses? Almost, but not actually. Has color film killed B&W film? Almost, but not actually. One could go ahead forever with such comparisons... Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDML" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 6:58 PM Subject: Just for the hell of it! > Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is > better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took > with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, have done with > film. > > -graywolf > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
