Someone has way too much time on their hands. David Savage wrote: > On 4/24/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is >> better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took >> with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, have done with >> film. >> > > I have hundreds of shots that I would not have taken with film but I > have with digital. > > They're a waste of pixels & would have been an even bigger (and more > expensive) waste of film. Such as: > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/WastedPixels.jpg> > > And this one is more interesting than most. > > :-) > > Cheers, > > Dave > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
