Do you mean this ISN'T the PJCODML (Pummel JCO Discuss Mailing List) ?

Pardon me.  Which door was it?

Tom C.


>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:33:08 -0700
>
>Looks like I'm going to need tighter filtering, but, as long as I saw this
>...
>
>JCO, the thread has moved from your specific comment through the general
>rendering of the 85mm lens bokeh to some general comments about bokeh.
>It's no longer about YOUR specific comments.  Threads and discussions on
>the PDML, as well as other mail lists, tend to wander.
>
>Further, you are now making a personal attack by calling a contributor to
>the thread "clueless."  True, it's only a mild attack, but one that's going
>to leave you open to some negative comments and possibly start another
>flame war, more than likely causing you to, once again, use abusive
>language and post your messages using lots of upper case  letters, and get
>any number of people here to the point where they'll start responding in
>kind, as which already seems to be the case.
>
>I just don't understand you.  A couple of days ago Norm and I apologized
>for contributing to the last outburst, and Tim strongly took your side of
>that issue, and your response was "fuck you" in three separate posts, one
>to Norm, one directed at me, and least understandable, one to Tim.
>
>Relax, chill out, enjoy your camera, or your DVD player, or your HDTV ...
>vent your anger in other ways - go out and take a walk, get some exercise,
>cut back on the sugar intake.   LIGHTEN UP - not every comment is about you
>or directed to you.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Shel
>
>
>
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show
> > > he is completely clueless. His deductions make
> > > no sense because he either doesnt understand
> > > or never noticed how unsharp mask works
> > > or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly
> > > stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible
> > > in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain
> > > bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that
> > > based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it.
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to