No problem.

Tom C.


>From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:44:08 -0400
>
>I apologize, it was someone else telling
>me to "let it slide", talk a walk, etc.
>those comments were meant for them.
>jco
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Tom C
>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:21 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>
>
>"Please don't tell me how to react/respond
>to all this craziness because you are not the one being repeatedly
>subjected to it."
>
>Did I tell you how to react or respond?
>
>Cause and effect.
>
>Introspection.
>
>Tom C.
>
>
> >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
> >Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:16:21 -0400
> >
> >HUH? If someone else is WRONG when
> >they imply I must not know what the hell I am
> >doing to defend their WRONG contention, they
> >are going to get a reply to set he record straight.
> >I dont have any other choice but to defend
> >myself..
> >
> >And I dont "feel" persecuted, I AM being persecuted
> >here. I get long third party letters saying I shouldnt
> >be calling someone "clueless" after being wrongly
> >provoked while other as posting My name and the A-word
> >in caps right in the subject headers WITHOUT any provocation
> >whatsoever. Please don't tell me how to react/respond to all this
> >craziness because you are not the one being repeatedly subjected to it.
> >jco
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>
> >Tom C
> >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 6:20 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
> >
> >
> >I'm curious if this is the only place you feel persecuted or if it
> >occurs elsewhere in life and online as well.
> >
> >You know people have their own perceptions and opinions.  Those
> >perceptions and opinions will almost always be different from one
> >another.  It does not
> >make your's right and someone else's wrong.
> >
> >And even if someone else was wrong, so what?
> >
> >
> >Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
> > >Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
> > >Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:01:09 -0400
> > >
> > >NO this was not a general discussion that I responded to harshly, he
> > >specifically stated the the M85 F2.0 lens which the thread was
> > >originally written about "has just about the smoothest bokeh of any
> > >lens I have seen" and suggested that the reason was most likely bad
> > >digital processing completely ignoring the fact that I had already
> > >stated teh M85 F2.0 lens had very bad bokeh visible IN THE VIEWFINDER
>
> > >which should have been a clue for him as well as the photos I posted.
>
> > >If he suspected that sharpening or processing might be causing the
> > >problem he should have asked about it, not assumed it must be,
> > >implying that I dont know what bad bokeh is when I see it or cant do
> > >basic digital image processing.
> > >
> > >Regarding "taking my side" on that other thread, continuing that
> > >thread
> >
> > >by posting replies without bothering to change the thread header
> > >containing JCO and the offensive "A-word" right in the subject header
>
> > >was NOT taking my side the way I see/saw it, it only made it far
> > >worse & I found it hard to believe it wasnt being done intentionally
> > >at the time.
> > >The whole point of my complaint was that was being said in the
>headers
> > >and you all just continued to do it at the time...
> > >jco
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > >Of
> >
> > >Shel Belinkoff
> > >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:33 PM
> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
> > >
> > >
> > >Looks like I'm going to need tighter filtering, but, as long as I saw
>
> > >this ...
> > >
> > >JCO, the thread has moved from your specific comment through the
> > >general rendering of the 85mm lens bokeh to some general comments
> > >about
> >
> > >bokeh. It's no longer about YOUR specific comments.  Threads and
> > >discussions on the PDML, as well as other mail lists, tend to wander.
> > >
> > >Further, you are now making a personal attack by calling a
> > >contributor to the thread "clueless."  True, it's only a mild attack,
>
> > >but one that's going to leave you open to some negative comments and
> > >possibly start another flame war, more than likely causing you to,
> > >once again, use abusive language and post your messages using lots of
>
> > >upper case letters, and get any number of people here to the point
> > >where they'll start responding in kind, as which already seems to be
> > >the case.
> > >
> > >I just don't understand you.  A couple of days ago Norm and I
> > >apologized for contributing to the last outburst, and Tim strongly
> > >took
> >
> > >your side of that issue, and your response was "fuck you" in three
> > >separate posts, one to Norm, one directed at me, and least
> > >understandable, one to Tim.
> > >
> > >Relax, chill out, enjoy your camera, or your DVD player, or your HDTV
>
> > >... vent your anger in other ways - go out and take a walk, get some
> > >exercise,
> > >cut back on the sugar intake.   LIGHTEN UP - not every comment is
>about
> > >you
> > >or directed to you.
> > >
> > >Kind regards,
> > >
> > >Shel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > > > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show
> > > > > he is completely clueless. His deductions make
> > > > > no sense because he either doesnt understand
> > > > > or never noticed how unsharp mask works
> > > > > or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly stated
>
> > > > > that this bokeh problem is easily visible in the viewfinder.
> > > > > Either or both ways its just plain bad to be posting completely
> > > > > wrong stuff
> > >
> > > > > like that based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he
> > > > > posts
> > >
> > > > > it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to