sorry, but your as mistaken as WR is. And just as bad for not reading my posts in entirety and not knowing how USM works or behaves with out of focus parts of the image. We are not talking about "rendering" here, which includes many parameters of the lens formed image, we are talking about the bokeh of the formed lens image. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:57 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh ?? The M85/2 has excellent rendering properties. I only sold mine because I wanted the shorter focal length and full functionality of the shorter FA77. The bokeh of any lens is very sensitive to what has been done to render the image, not to the capture medium. Clumsy image processing will ruin the rendering qualities of any lens. G On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Thibouille wrote: > Mmm I find the bokeh to be quite OK: not bad but not good either. But > this lens seems very sharp otherwise. > > Mmm I wonder if digital vs film has a big influence over bokeh. I'd > like to see a comparison like this. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
