[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I doubt that there are many shots that _can't_ be achieved on film. >It's a matter of how hard one has to work to get them.
Indeed. It's often not so much a cast that an image *couldn't* have been done on film as that it *wouldn't* have been if the photographer had been using film. One type strikes me as falling into that category is exotic flash setups: Multiple flashes at various locations within a scene, sometimes at a variety of power settings. Look through http://strobist.blogspot.com/ and you'll find examples that were done on digital because doing so on film, though possible, would have taken too much trial and error to be practical. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
