And I've got one for that too. http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/90892810/in/set-287706/
Large/direct link: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/15/90892810_67d98971f4_b.jpg Canon EOS 3, 24-105 f4L IS at f4 and 1/8th sec. Tri-X pushed to 6400 in TMax Dev and slightly underdeveloped. -Adam Odd, both the images I've posted here were shot with Cameras I no longer own. In fact the EOS 3 was purchased by trading in the *istD. J. C. O'Connell wrote: >I think the converse question would be also interesting, >what shots you have anyone shot on film that can't/could not have been >done on today's digital SLRs? >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >graywolf >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 12:59 PM >To: PDML >Subject: Just for the hell of it! > > >Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is > >better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took >with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, have done with > >film. > >-graywolf > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
