You definitely got that one wrong on the test... Norm J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I guess I am sheltered, but I have never seen a "recommended > but not enforced" speed "suggestion" sign in my life. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Tom C > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 5:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVDequipthatcan playPAL > systemDVD's > > > No. I said a yellow recommended speed sign is not a posted speed limit, > at > least where I live, and it's therefore not breaking a law to ignore a > suggestion. It is against the law to exceed the limit. > > > > Tom C. > > > >> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> >> Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVDequipthatcan playPAL >> systemDVD's >> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:58:15 -0400 >> >> HUH? are you saying USA posted speed limits under 55 are not the law? >> You are very mistaken, and just begging for a ticket. Any cops out >> there following this guy ? ? ? jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> > > >> Tom C >> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:44 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVDequipthatcan playPAL >> systemDVD's >> >> >> Why does every department of transportation spend uncounted millions of >> > > >> dollars putting up yellow recommended speed signs, for instance, a >> speed of 45 mph around a curve, when the speed limit is in reality 55? >> > > >> Becuase they >> would like to suggest a slower speed, but it's not a law. >> >> Because, believe it or not, every single action and protocol is not >> mandated by a law somewhere and they do not require the force of a law. >> > > >> They are not >> that important. >> >> >> Tom C. >> >> >>> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> Then there must be some kind of loophole >>> or blantant disregard for the sales agreements >>> on these. I ask you, if it were intended to be legal >>> to disregard the region coding why would be have even been >>> implemented in the first place? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>> Of >>> >>> Shel Belinkoff >>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:08 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: OT - for those of you who have DVD equipthatcan playPAL >>> systemDVD's >>> >>> >>> That's odd. I have friends in other parts of the world who have such >>> > > >>> players, easily purchased in retail establishments in their cities. >>> For example, a couple of friends in Tel Aviv have region free DVD >>> players. And, as I said in an earlier post, they are readily >>> available at numerous outlets in San Francisco >>> >>> Shel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>> >>> think about it for a second, if >>> region free players or cross regioned >>> players were available legally >>> anywhere, the entire region coding >>> system would make no sense to >>> designa and implement! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
