http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/K10D%20SR%20Test.html
Check that link. I did a quick test of the SR on the K10D, the day i bought it. It works very well, i think. The pentaprisim is worth it to, AFAIC. dAVE On 4/19/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The K100D is essentially a DL with better AF, Anti-shake and somewhat > better JPEG's (Not sure exactly how much better, I never shot JPEGs when > I had the K100D). > > If you want a real upgrade, get the K10D. If you just want AS, get the > K100D. > > -Adam > > > AlexG wrote: > > >Hi guys, > > > >I have been quite annoyed at all the low-light shots that I had to > >delete because of slight camera shake. While I'd love to have the use > >of a tripod, I A- Don't have one and B- wouldn't bring it with me if I > >did, so I've decided that shake reduction is a feature worth having. > > > >Also the JPEGs out of the DL are only satisfactory under very specific > >conditions. The k100d and k10d are both much better from what I've > >seen. > > > >I currently have an *ist DL, with 18-55 and 50-200 lenses. My M42 > >50mm/1.4 is currently sitting on ebay, because I suck at focusing when > >the light is low. > > > >Anyway, I am in a bit of a pickle. I am hesitating between k100d and > >k10d, the former being about half the cost of the k10d makes it > >extremely attractive right now. > > > >Here are the advantages of each, as I see them. > > > >K100d: > >CHEAP!! > >Lower noise > >Up to iso3200 > >Better dynamic range than k10d (as measured in raw by Imaging-Resource) > >AA Batteries > > > >K10d: > >10MP makes for an extra 800x600 of breathing room when cropping > >Pentaprism viewfinder > >SSD/SSM/USM in-lens focus compatibility (==future-proof) > >Excellent firmware (customizable white balance presets, mtf priority, > >adjustable autoiso range, hyperprogram, etc) > > > >Plan is to sell the DL, body-only for 250-300 on ebay, as it is almost > >new (2100 pics vs the 17000 that seems to be the norm here :) ) > > > >I will get the FA50/1.4 at the time of purchase. > > > >I have been concerned about the k10d's image quality, both from a > >noise and 'banding' perspective. Proprietary li-ion batteries piss me > >off because they cost so much to replace. > > > >But the pentaprism looks gooooooooooood. As do some of the pictures > >I've seen. And SSM seems to be the proper solution to the pentax SLR > >slow autofocus syndrome, though this has yet to be verified. The > >lenses (DA*) seem to be very nice, and quite fast compared to the > >current DA zooms so they'd be nice to upgrade to. > > > >If I get the k100d, i can get SR RIGHT NOW and worry about a > >super-high-end camera in a year's time when the k10d's successor comes > >out. > > > >Anyway, I am thoroughly confused and I apologize for being a windbag > >in this thread. I realize this has probably been debated ad nausea, > >but I need some help to push me off the fence in either direction. > > > >Alex > > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
