William Robb wrote:
> From: Adam Maas
> Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:52:47 -0800
> 
>> You don't agree, that's nice.
> 
>> It works for me. Note also (as per our last go 'round on the subject of
>> open-aperture metering) that I'm rarely shooting more than 2 stops down
>>from wide open. And I shoot with fast lenses.
> 
> It seems to me that shooting a fast lens stopped down a couple of stops
> would give a similar viewfinder
> brightness as using a zoom lens wide open, but you would have the benefit
> of a generally higher contrast image to work with.
> I can't believe people can't figure this out and choose to argue about it 
> instead,
> since we've been manually focusing zoom lenses in the f/4-f/5.6 maximum 
> aperture range for a
> couple of decades.
> Obviously, it's doable.
> 
> William Robb
> 
> 

Yep. And I prefer to be as cloe to wide-open as is workable, I like to 
see the character of the lens which is so often hidden at small 
apertures, as well as shallow DoF. So I shoot fast glass wide open (And 
hit my head on max shutter speeds all the time).

I actually get a lot of questions when people look at my exposure data, 
usually along the lines of 'why the hell did you shoot this at 1/3200 
and f3.3?' or similar, or conversely 'how did you get the nice out of 
focus areas?'.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to