What no green button' Dave
Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > thanks, that makes sense. jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:03 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D > > > Canon offers FF (1Ds series, 5D), 1.3x crop (the 1D series high fps > bodies) and 1.6x crop (Digital Rebels, 30D and antescendants). EF-S > lenses are for the 1.6x cropped bodies from the original Digital Rebel > on, earlier 1.6x crop bodies cannot use them as they are mechanically > incompatible with plain EF mount bodies (EF-S bodies can mount EF-S > lenses, but EF-S lenses do not mount on EF bodies). > > -Adam > > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> Curious, do all canon non FF DSLRS >> have the same crop factor and is canon >> now offering "digital non FF lenses" that only >> cover the smaller than FF sensors like Pentax is? >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of Adam Maas >> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:50 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D >> >> >> Cory Papenfuss wrote: >> >>>>> Yeah... I give Canon 6 months before they introduce in-body >>>>> anti-shake. I think they'll have to to compete. Given that > probably >> >> >>>>> 90% of the DSLR buyers never buy another lens other than the kit >>>>> lens, it's a great selling point. >>>> >>>> I think they'll just make all the CKLs (crappy kit lenses) IS from >>>> now >> >> >>>> on. They have one ( the 17-85 USM IS) already. Combine that with >>>> the >> >> >>>> atrocious 70-300 f4-5.6 IS and you have a full range of >>>> image-stabilized focal lengths for your "average" digiRebel user. >>>> >>> >>> I was unaware that they had mediocre IS lenses.... I thought >> >> they >> >>> were all pretty much on the decent-good scale. What you propose makes >> >> a >> >>> lot more sense, and is more "Canon-esk"... force more lens purchases. >>> >>> -Cory >>> >> >> >> The original IS lens, the 75-300, is a hunk of putrescent crap. >> >> Non-L zooms are typically mediocre to poor, the exception being the >> 28-105 f3.5-4.5 (the f4-5.6 version is craptacular), the 70-300's >> (good on 1.6x crop bodies, average on film, poor on FF) and the two >> 'almost L' EF-S zooms, the 10-22 and 17-55 IS. Non-L primes are all >> over the place, mostly excellent, but there's a few dogs (Same goes >> for the L line, the 14L in particular is a dog). >> >> -Adam >> >> > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
