OK, make that 85%.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Do you really think that 90% of DSLR buyers
> will never buy another lens? That's crazy!
> One of the main reasons for using SLRS/DSLRS
> is to be able to change lenses as needed.
> In fact the digital point and shoots are now
> getting so good, some going to bigger sensors,
> that it wouldnt make sense to even go with a
> DSLR for those 90% people...
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Cory Papenfuss
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:57 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
>
>>>> ROTFL Great slip :-))
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Still looking for the slip, but it sure was a buggered up
>>>
> sentence.
>
>>> Made sense in my mind's ear when I composted it, I'm sure... :)
>>>
> Oops... read right over that.
>
>
>> Well it just stands to reason that Cannikon users are bound to be a
>> little sizzled between the ears if they disregard Pentax as a serious
>> competitor....
>>
>>
> Yeah... I give Canon 6 months before they introduce in-body
> anti-shake. I think they'll have to to compete. Given that probably
> 90%
> of the DSLR buyers never buy another lens other than the kit lens, it's
> a
> great selling point. I think it'll be interesting to see how they
> back-pedal on justifying it over the much-touted in-lens version.
> Probably cripple it somehow.... like they did with AF-indication on MF
> lenses.
>
> -Cory
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
