YOU ARE CRAZY - its much better to have all your cameras matched as to metering sensitivity with the exposure compensation set to ZERO. I didnt suggest removing exposure compensation, I suggested a global metering sensitivity adjustment INTENTIONALLY buried in a custom setting or menu so it couldnt be accidentslly changed so you could adjust all your cameras for the same and CORRECT metering sensitivity with exp comp set to ZERO. .
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:00 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Need Advice: value of an *istD outfit No. It would accomplish the same thing as exposure comp in a more difficult manner. Exposure comp works fine. The D always tended to underexpose a half stop. Based on my first 700 frames or so, the K10 appears to be right on. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Need Advice: value of an *istD outfit > > > >I shot the wedding ceremony with both my D and the K10 in available > >light. My D was set with a half stop over exposure comp, the K10 was > >baselined. The exposures were virtually identical. > > Good. You have practical experience. > Do you think a buried adjustment for matching your cameras would be > preferable to exposure compensation? > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
