That's basically what exposure comp does on the D or the K10. It remains set until you turn it off. Paul On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:41 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I SURE DO. > > You would have to be an idiot to think otherwise. > Why in the world would you want to have to remember > or ignore exposure compensation settings for each > camera when you could match them once and for > all and have them behave identically without > any exposure compensation. thats much better > from a user standpoint and when you REALLY want > or need exposure compensation it would be dialed > in as normal, not added or subtracted from some > base setting off zero that is already there for > body to body matching. > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:56 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Need Advice: value of an *istD outfit > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Need Advice: value of an *istD outfit > > >> I shot the wedding ceremony with both my D and the K10 in available >> light. My D was set with a half stop over exposure comp, the K10 was >> baselined. The exposures were virtually identical. > > Good. You have practical experience. > Do you think a buried adjustment for matching your cameras would be > preferable to exposure compensation? > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
